Non-profiteering status does not exempt taxable technical testing services; penalty waived absent deliberate intention.

A claim that an entity is non-profiteering does not by itself create immunity from service tax where the activity is otherwise taxable as Technical and Testing Service; the tax demand was therefore sustained. Penalty was, however, waived because the adjudication record did not show deliberate intention, making penal consequences unwarranted on the facts. Interest on the tax demand remained payable. The appeal thus succeeded only in part, with the demand maintained and the penalty set aside.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether the service tax demand raised on Technical and Testing Service was liable to be interfered with on the plea that the appellant was a non-profiteering organisation; (ii) whether penalty imposed on the appellant was sustainable.

Issue (i): whether the service tax demand raised on Technical and Testing Service was liable to be interfered with on the plea that the appellant was a non-profiteering organisation.

Analysis: The demand was found to relate to taxable Technical and Testing Service. The plea that the appellant was a non-profiteering organisation was held to have no basis in the taxation scheme, and no exemption or immunity on that ground was accepted.

Conclusion: The demand was sustained and the appeal failed on the tax demand aspect.

Issue (ii): whether penalty imposed on the appellant was sustainable.

Analysis: The circumstances recorded in the adjudication order were treated as showing absence of deliberate intention, and penalty was considered unwarranted in the facts of the case.

Conclusion: The penalty was waived.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only in part, with the tax demand maintained, penalty set aside, and interest remaining payable on the tax demand.

Ratio Decidendi: A claim of non-profiteering status does not by itself confer immunity from service tax, while penalty may be waived where the record does not show deliberate intention.

---