Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2016 (12) TMI 1763 - SC - Indian Laws

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Commercial operation date requirements and waiver limits in power purchase agreements cannot override tariff-linked consumer interest. A contractual commercial operation date under a power purchase agreement could not be treated as achieved where the performance test certificate did not ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Commercial operation date requirements and waiver limits in power purchase agreements cannot override tariff-linked consumer interest.

                          A contractual commercial operation date under a power purchase agreement could not be treated as achieved where the performance test certificate did not satisfy the stipulated 95% contracted-capacity standard and the commissioning conditions remained unmet. The Court held that waiver of that requirement was not established because waiver needs a clear and intentional relinquishment of a known contractual right; the correspondence showed only a limited operational acceptance of de-rated capacity, not waiver of the COD condition. It further held that any waiver affecting tariff in a competitively bid electricity arrangement could not be enforced where it would prejudice consumer and public interest. The finding accepting COD on 31.3.2013 and waiver was therefore set aside.




                          Issues: (i) Whether Unit No. 3 of the project could be treated as having achieved commercial operation on 31.3.2013 under the power purchase agreement, despite the performance test certificate showing tested capacity far below the contracted capacity and the requirements of the commissioning schedule not being satisfied. (ii) Whether the procurers had validly waived the contractual requirement of achieving 95% of contracted capacity, and whether such waiver could be given effect to when tariff and consumer interest were affected.

                          Issue (i): Whether Unit No. 3 of the project could be treated as having achieved commercial operation on 31.3.2013 under the power purchase agreement, despite the performance test certificate showing tested capacity far below the contracted capacity and the requirements of the commissioning schedule not being satisfied.

                          Analysis: The contractual scheme required synchronization, commissioning, and then commercial operation only after a final test certificate recording successful performance testing at not less than 95% of contracted capacity for 72 continuous hours and compliance with the relevant functional requirements. The certificate dated 30.3.2013 recorded tested capacity of only 101.38 MW, did not satisfy the contractual performance standard, and did not answer the stipulated requirement for commercial operation. On the record, the later certificate in August alone satisfied the contractual preconditions.

                          Conclusion: Unit No. 3 could not be treated as having achieved commercial operation on 31.3.2013; the contractual COD did not arise on that date.

                          Issue (ii): Whether the procurers had validly waived the contractual requirement of achieving 95% of contracted capacity, and whether such waiver could be given effect to when tariff and consumer interest were affected.

                          Analysis: Waiver under contract law requires a clear and intentional relinquishment of a known right. The correspondence relied upon showed only a refusal to accept the 30.3.2013 certificate as compliance with the contractual standard and a limited acceptance of de-rated capacity for immediate operational purposes. The Court further held that any waiver affecting tariff under a competitively bid power purchase structure would impact consumer interest and public interest, and therefore could not be enforced without satisfying the statutory framework governing tariff and bidding-based adoption.

                          Conclusion: There was no valid waiver of the 95% requirement, and in any event such a waiver could not be given effect to where it would adversely affect consumer and public interest.

                          Final Conclusion: The appellate finding accepting COD on 31.3.2013 and upholding waiver was set aside, and the regulatory commission's view was restored on the central questions of contractual compliance and public-interest limits on waiver.

                          Ratio Decidendi: A contractual condition in a competitively bid electricity tariff arrangement that is integral to commissioning and affects consumer tariff cannot be waived except by a clear intentional relinquishment, and such waiver will not be enforced where it undermines public or consumer interest.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found