Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to refund of special additional duty under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus. dated 14-9-2007 when the goods sold were described as computer parts and not the whole computer system imported.
Analysis: The refund notification applied only where the imported goods, after sale, satisfied the prescribed conditions. The invoices showed that the appellant had imported old and used computer system sets with accessories, but the goods sold were described as old and used computer parts after removing the computer system. As the whole system imported had not been sold, the required identity between the imported goods and the sold goods was not established.
Conclusion: The appellant was not entitled to the refund claim and the rejection of refund was /confirmed in substance.