Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest credited to minors who were admitted to the benefits of a partnership is to be included in the father's income under section 16(3)(a)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: Section 16(3)(a)(ii) operates to include in an individual's total income so much of a minor child's income as arises directly or indirectly from the minor's admission to the benefits of a partnership of which the individual is a partner. The relevant inquiry is whether the receipt of the income has a connection, direct or indirect, with the fact of admission; the words "directly or indirectly" make the nature of the connection irrelevant. Interest paid to a minor is connected with admission if it is paid on capital invested by the minor (or on a loan advanced by the minor where the partnership could accept loans only from partners or persons admitted to its benefits). Whether the amount paid by the minor was a capital contribution or a loan is a question of fact. A tribunal's finding of fact that the minors' payments were investments of capital binds the court.
Conclusion: The interest credited to the minors on the amounts found to be capital investment is income arising indirectly from their admission to the benefits of the partnership and is includible in the father's assessment under Section 16(3)(a)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.