Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest earned by minor sons on amounts standing to their credit in the firm was includible in the assessee-father's total income under Section 16(3)(a)(ii) of the Indian Income-tax Act.
Analysis: Section 16(3)(a)(ii) applies only where income arises to a minor directly or indirectly from admission to the benefits of a partnership. The partnership deed merely fixed interest on money standing to a partner's credit and did not compel the minors to keep deposits in the firm or oblige the firm to retain them. The interest was earned because the minors chose to keep their moneys with the firm, not because of their admission to the partnership. The provision creating the father's liability being a taxing fiction, it had to be construed strictly and could not be extended to cover income that was not connected with the minors' admission to partnership benefits.
Conclusion: The interest earned by the minor sons on their deposits was not includible in the assessee's total income under Section 16(3)(a)(ii), and the question was answered in the negative, in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: For Section 16(3)(a)(ii) to apply, the minor's income must arise directly or indirectly from admission to the benefits of the partnership; interest earned merely on voluntary deposits with the firm is not such income.