Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an executing court has power to fix and reduce the upset price for sale of property in court auction after the amendment to Order XXI Rule 66 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Analysis: The amended scheme of Order XXI Rule 66 required the sale proclamation to include the estimates given by the decree-holder and the judgment-debtor, but it did not take away the court's power to make its own estimate where the circumstances justified it. The distinction between the property's value and the upset price was recognised, and the proviso was construed as removing any obligation to enter the court's own estimate, not as imposing a prohibition on doing so. The power to fix an upset price, and when necessary to reduce it, was treated as part of the court's continuing discretion to conduct the sale fairly and to protect both parties' interests.
Conclusion: The executing court has power to fix the upset price and also to reduce it when necessary. The revision petition was therefore liable to be dismissed.