Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the unabsorbed balance of irrecoverable rent allowed by the exemption notification in respect of income from house property could be carried forward and deducted in subsequent assessment years.
Analysis: The relief under the notification was confined to income assessed under the head "property" and was limited to an amount equal to one year's rent. The tax on property was based on notional annual value, and the notification granted a restricted exemption only when rent had in fact become irrecoverable. The wording of the notification did not provide for accumulation or carry forward of any balance beyond the specified yearly limit. The existence of express statutory provisions in the Act for carrying forward relief in other contexts reinforced that such a right could not be implied into an exemption notification. The Court also held that an assessee could not allow arrears to accumulate over several years and then seek exemption for the entire accumulation.
Conclusion: The unabsorbed balance of irrecoverable rent could not be carried forward to later years, and the answer was against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A fiscal exemption notification must be construed strictly, and where it grants relief only up to one year's rent for irrecoverable property income, no right to carry forward any unabsorbed balance can be implied unless the notification expressly so provides.