Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the equity shareholders' meeting should be convened in connection with the proposed amalgamation scheme and whether a chairman and alternate chairman should be appointed to conduct the meeting.
Analysis: The application sought directions for amalgamation proceedings. As there were no creditors, no creditors' meeting was required. The equity shareholders' meeting, however, was required to be held in accordance with the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959. Consent of the proposed chairman and alternate chairman having been informed to the Court, directions were issued for their appointment, publication of notice in the prescribed newspapers, fixation of the meeting date, and determination of remuneration and expenses.
Conclusion: The application was allowed to the extent of directing convening of the equity shareholders' meeting and appointing the chairman and alternate chairman.