Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions had jurisdiction under Section 11(f) to declare the minority status of an existing educational institution, and whether Section 10(1) confines applications for establishment of a new minority educational institution to the competent authority.
Analysis: The statutory scheme, as amended in 2006, separates the power to obtain a no objection certificate for establishing a minority educational institution from the wider power of the Commission to decide all questions relating to the minority status of an institution and declare that status. Section 10(1) operates at the inception of a new institution and requires recourse to the competent authority, while Section 11(f) is expressed in broad terms and applies notwithstanding anything inconsistent in other laws. Read harmoniously, the provisions do not confer concurrent original routes for establishment, but preserve the Commission's power to determine the status of an already existing institution. Article 30 was treated as reinforcing the statutory width of that power.
Conclusion: The Commission had jurisdiction under Section 11(f) to declare the minority status of an existing institution. Section 10(1) is confined to the grant of a no objection certificate for establishing a new minority educational institution. The challenge to the validity of the status declaration failed, and the impugned judgment was set aside.
Final Conclusion: The statutory framework was held to permit the Commission to decide and declare the minority status of an existing educational institution, while leaving establishment of a new minority institution to the competent authority under Section 10(1).
Ratio Decidendi: Section 11(f) of the 2004 Act confers a broad declaratory power on the Commission to determine the minority status of existing educational institutions, whereas Section 10(1) is limited to obtaining prior approval for establishing a new minority educational institution.