Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reference questions required adjudication when the Tribunal had already directed a fresh hearing before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and remitted the penalty appeals for reconsideration.
Analysis: The notice for penalty under the relevant provisions was treated as duly served, but the core procedural safeguard remained the requirement of a reasonable opportunity of hearing before penalty could be sustained. Since the Tribunal restored the matter to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner with directions to hear the assessee fully on the merits of the explanations for delay and failure to furnish the estimate, the statutory requirement of hearing was substantially preserved. The discussion also noted the settled legal position that the limitation bar in the relevant provision governing penalty proceedings applies to the initial order and does not defeat action taken pursuant to directions of a higher authority.
Conclusion: The reference questions were treated as academic and left unanswered, and the matter was sent back for compliance with the Tribunal's remand directions.