Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was liable to be quashed for failure to aver that the accused did not make payment within 15 days of receipt of notice.
Analysis: The complaint disclosed dishonour of the cheque and issuance of notice, but it did not state that the accused failed to pay the amount within the statutory period after receipt of notice. The sworn statement also did not contain any such averment. Since the cause of action under Section 138 arises only on failure to make payment within 15 days of the notice, the omission went to the root of the prosecution.
Conclusion: The complaint lacked an essential ingredient of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and the criminal proceedings were quashed.