ITAT upholds CIT(A)'s decision on penalty under Section 271D, except minor cash amount

The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271D, except for a minor amount taken in cash, thereby contravening Section 269SS. The ITAT found that transactions through journal entries were genuine and for commercial reasons. The assessee had reasonable cause for the contravention as supported by judicial precedents. The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Deletion of Penalty under Section 271D for contravention of Section 269SS of the Income Tax Act.
2. Genuineness of transactions made through journal entries.
3. Reasonable cause for the contravention of Section 269SS.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Deletion of Penalty under Section 271D for contravention of Section 269SS:
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order which deleted the penalty of Rs. 2,18,00,667/- imposed under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2009-10. The Revenue contended that the CIT(A) erred in deleting the penalty despite the assessee's contravention of Section 269SS by accepting loans/deposits through journal entries, which were not made via account payee cheque or bank draft.

2. Genuineness of Transactions Made Through Journal Entries:
The CIT(A) observed that the transactions recorded through journal entries were genuine and made for commercial reasons such as assigning receivables, reimbursement of expenses, and operational efficiency. The CIT(A) noted that there was no evidence suggesting that these transactions involved unaccounted income or were undertaken to evade tax. The CIT(A) relied on the Bombay High Court's decision in the case of Triumph International Finance (I) Ltd., which held that journal entries for settling liabilities do not necessarily violate Section 269SS if they are genuine and undertaken in the ordinary course of business.

3. Reasonable Cause for the Contravention of Section 269SS:
The CIT(A) found that the assessee had reasonable cause for the contravention of Section 269SS. The assessee believed, based on various judicial decisions, that transactions through journal entries did not violate Section 269SS. The CIT(A) also noted that the decision of the Bombay High Court in Triumph International Finance (I) Ltd. was rendered after the financial year in question, which supported the assessee's belief that journal entries were permissible. The CIT(A) concluded that the transactions were undertaken for legitimate commercial reasons and not to evade tax, thus constituting reasonable cause under Section 273B of the Act.

Conclusion:
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271D, except for a minor amount of Rs. 5000/- which was taken in cash, thereby contravening Section 269SS. The ITAT agreed with the CIT(A) that the transactions made through journal entries were genuine and undertaken for commercial reasons. The ITAT also acknowledged that the assessee had reasonable cause for the contravention, as the belief that journal entries did not violate Section 269SS was supported by judicial precedents existing before the relevant High Court decision. Consequently, the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed.

---