Finality of unchallenged deduction findings bars remand to reopen receipt character and eligibility for tax relief.

The Tribunal could not remand the matter to re-examine the character of lease rental or the assessee's eligibility for deduction under Section 80IA(4)(iii) when the Revenue had not challenged that deduction finding and it had already attained finality. The assessee had been recognised as an industrial park developer under the notified scheme, and the first appellate authority had accepted statutory eligibility for the deduction. Once that position was unchallenged, the head under which the receipt was assessed was immaterial for the deduction claim. Rule 11 of the Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1962 did not permit reopening an issue not raised by the Revenue. The remand order was set aside.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in remanding the matter to examine the character of the receipt and the eligibility for deduction under Section 80IA(4)(iii) when the Revenue had not challenged the deduction issue before it and the matter had attained finality.

Analysis: The assessee had been recognised as an industrial park developer under the notified scheme and the first appellate authority had held that the assessee satisfied the conditions for deduction under Section 80IA(4)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Revenue's appeal before the Tribunal did not challenge that finding on deduction entitlement and was directed only against the view that the lease rental was business income. In that situation, the Tribunal could not revive an issue that was not in dispute and order a fresh enquiry into the nature of the receipt as if it were still open. The question of the head of income was held to be immaterial for the purpose of the deduction once the statutory eligibility under Section 80IA(4)(iii) had been accepted. Rule 11 of the Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1962 did not justify reopening a matter that had not been raised as a ground or additional ground by the Revenue.

Conclusion: The remand order was unsustainable and was set aside in favour of the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: A Tribunal cannot remand a matter for further enquiry on an issue that the appellant has not challenged and that has already attained finality, especially where the statutory deduction does not depend on the head under which the receipt is assessed.

---