Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the general recruitment rules framed under Article 309 of the Constitution superseded the special recruitment rules framed under Section 39 of the Fire Force Act, 1964, and whether promotion to the post of Leading Firemen could be made on seniority alone without the qualifying examination prescribed by the special rules.
Analysis: The special fire service rules were made under a statute enacted by the Legislature and specifically governed recruitment and promotion in the fire service. The later amendment to the general civil service rules was an exercise of the Governor's rule-making power under Article 309, which operates only until the field is occupied by legislation. Once the Legislature has enacted a law and special rules have been framed under it, the executive rule-making power under Article 309 cannot displace those special rules. The principle that a general later law does not impliedly repeal or override an earlier special law also applies, so the amendment to the general rules could not alter the special requirement of passing the qualifying examination.
Conclusion: The special fire force rules continued to govern promotions, and the appellants' promotion on the basis of seniority alone was not valid.
Final Conclusion: The appeals were devoid of merit because the special statutory recruitment regime for the fire service remained controlling and was not overridden by the later general service rules.
Ratio Decidendi: A special statutory service rule framed under an enabling Act is not overridden by a later general rule made under Article 309 where the legislative field is already occupied, and implied repeal will not be inferred against the special law absent clear intention.