Excise valuation by best judgment applies where goods are neither sold nor captively consumed for manufacture of other articles.

Where excisable goods are neither sold nor captively consumed for manufacture of other articles, Rule 8 of the Central Excise (Determination of Price of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2000 does not apply. Valuation must then proceed under Rule 11 on a best-judgment basis. The article notes that P.C. poles not sold and not used in the manufacture of any other article could not be valued under Rule 8, so invocation of Rule 11 was correct and the assessee's challenge failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether Rule 11 of the Central Excise (Determination of Price of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2000 could be invoked to determine the value of P.C. poles when the goods were not sold and were not captively consumed for manufacture of other articles.

Analysis: The goods were not sold by the assessee, and Rule 8 of the Central Excise (Determination of Price of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2000 applies only where excisable goods are consumed captively for production of other articles. Since the poles were not used in the manufacture of any other article, Rule 8 had no application. In such a situation, valuation had to proceed by best judgment under Rule 11. The conclusion was supported by the binding decision holding that Rule 8 does not apply unless the goods are used for production or manufacture of other articles by the assessee or on its behalf.

Conclusion: Rule 11 was correctly invoked for valuation, and the assessee's challenge failed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where excisable goods are neither sold nor captively consumed for manufacture of other articles, Rule 8 of the 2000 Valuation Rules does not apply and valuation must be made under Rule 11 by best judgment.

---