TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appellate Tribunal Orders Remand for CENVAT Credit Disallowance Appeal</h1> <h3>M/s. Maruti Ispat &Energy Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax, Tirupati Commissionerate, Tirupati.</h3> The Appellate Tribunal found that lack of corroborative evidence regarding the receipt and consumption of iron ore and coal led to the disallowance of ... - Issues involved: Misappropriation of CENVAT credit on iron ore and coal, lack of corroborative evidence for receipt and consumption, disallowance of credit by the Commissioner, need for remand and fresh adjudication.In the judgment, the Appellate Tribunal found that a significant portion of the demand for CENVAT credit was contested due to the lack of corroborative evidence regarding the receipt of iron ore and coal by the appellant. The Commissioner concluded that the appellant was ineligible for the credit as they failed to provide sufficient evidence, including discrepancies in the filing of RG 23 Part-I. The appellant's failure to submit ER-5 and ER-6 returns further hindered the verification of raw material consumption, leading to the disallowance of the credit.Upon hearing both sides, the Tribunal determined that a remand was necessary in this case. They decided to waive the pre-deposit requirement and proceed with the appeal. The appellant's counsel informed the Tribunal that they now possess all necessary invoices and documents demonstrating the receipt of raw materials, both purchased independently and on behalf of another entity. The Tribunal deemed it appropriate for the original adjudicating authority to verify the voluminous documents provided by the appellant, leading to the decision to remand the matter for fresh adjudication.The Tribunal emphasized the importance of a thorough examination of the evidence presented and granted the appellants a reasonable opportunity to present their case during the fresh adjudication process. It was clarified that all issues were to be reconsidered, ensuring a well-reasoned order is issued in accordance with the law.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
