Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the striking off of the petitioner's name from the register of companies under Section 560 of the Companies Act was valid in light of non-compliance with the notice and publication requirements of Section 560(2) and Section 560(3).
Analysis: The Court examined the statutory scheme of Section 560, noting that Sub-sections (1) and (2) require service of notices and Sub-section (3) contemplates publication in the Official Gazette and sending notice by registered post with a three-month period before striking off under Sub-section (5). The Court held that the conditions precedent in Sub-section (3), including publication and service by registered post and the expiry of the specified period, are mandatory because they are preconditions to the exercise of the power under Sub-section (5). The record lacked any averment or evidence that the second notice was sent by registered post and showed no compliance with the mandatory publication and service requirements of Sub-section (3).
Conclusion: The publication dated 6.10.2007 and the striking off order dated 17.9.2007 are quashed insofar as they concern the petitioner; the petitioner's name is restored to the register of companies as if it had never been struck off. The petitioner is directed to file outstanding statutory returns within six weeks, and the period from 6.10.2007 until the date of restoration shall not count for limitation purposes.