Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an election petition filed on the day the High Court reopened after summer vacation was within time when the limitation period expired during a period declared to be a closed holiday, and whether the Registrar could validly receive the petition during that closure.
Analysis: The limitation for filing the election petition expired while the High Court was closed for summer vacation under the court calendar notified as closed holidays. Section 10 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 applies where an act or proceeding is required to be done within a prescribed period and the court or office is closed on the last day of that period. The Court distinguished the earlier decision relied upon by the High Court, because that case concerned a day when the court was open, whereas here the relevant period expired during a closed holiday. The Court also held that the mere availability of the Registrar and other ministerial staff during vacation did not mean that the court was open for the legal presentation of an election petition, since the prescribed procedure required further judicial action and the rules did not authorize receipt of such petitions during a closed holiday. The definition of "public holiday" in the election law did not govern this question, as the issue was controlled by the High Court calendar and Section 10 of the General Clauses Act.
Conclusion: The petition was treated as filed in due time on the reopening day, and the dismissal of the election petition as time-barred could not be sustained.