Successor company cannot carry forward predecessor allowances or losses absent clear statutory authority

A successor company could not deduct a predecessor's unabsorbed wear and tear allowances where the taxing provision required the trade to be computed as if it had begun on the date of succession, making the allowance confined to the successor's own trade. Trading loss relief was likewise personal to the company that sustained the loss, and neither the Companies Act nor an amalgamation scheme could transfer that right to the successor for set-off against its own profits. The statutory scheme therefore prevented pre-succession allowances and losses from being carried forward unless the legislation expressly provided otherwise.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether a company succeeding to the trade of another company could deduct unabsorbed wear and tear allowances earned by the predecessor before the succession; (ii) whether pre-amalgamation trading losses of the predecessor companies could be transferred to and set off by the successor company under the Companies Act and the scheme of amalgamation.

Issue (i): whether a company succeeding to the trade of another company could deduct unabsorbed wear and tear allowances earned by the predecessor before the succession

Analysis: Rule 11 of the Rules applicable to Cases I and II of Schedule D to the Income Tax Act, 1918, as substituted by Section 32 of the Finance Act, 1926, required the tax of the successor to be computed as if it had commenced the trade at the date of succession. That language treated the successor's trade as a new trade for tax purposes and excluded allowances attributable to periods before the succession. The allowance for wear and tear under Rule 6 was therefore confined to the taxpayer's own trade and could not be carried over from the predecessor.

Conclusion: The claim to deduct the predecessor's unabsorbed wear and tear allowances failed and was decided against the assessee.

Issue (ii): whether pre-amalgamation trading losses of the predecessor companies could be transferred to and set off by the successor company under the Companies Act and the scheme of amalgamation

Analysis: The relief for trading losses under Section 33 of the Finance Act, 1926, was personal to the taxpayer who sustained the loss. The provisions of Sections 153 and 154 of the Companies Act, 1929, and the amalgamation order could not transfer to the successor a right that the predecessor companies themselves never had in relation to the successor's later profits. The losses remained confined to the companies that incurred them and could not be treated as assets passing to the new company for set-off against its own trading profits.

Conclusion: The claim to set off the predecessor companies' losses failed and was decided against the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The statutory scheme did not permit a successor company to import and use the predecessor companies' unused allowances or losses against the successor's own profits, so the appeal failed in full.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the taxing provision directs that a successor's liability be computed as if the trade had been commenced on the date of succession, pre-succession allowances and losses attributable to the predecessor cannot be carried forward or transferred to the successor unless the statute clearly so provides.

---