High Court dismisses appeal under Section 35G of Central Excise Act for lack of substantial question of law The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act as the impugned order of CESTAT was only an order of ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
High Court dismisses appeal under Section 35G of Central Excise Act for lack of substantial question of law
The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act as the impugned order of CESTAT was only an order of remand and the findings were purely on facts with no substantial question of law. The appeal was dismissed in limine.
The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act as the impugned order of CESTAT was only an order of remand and the findings were purely on facts with no substantial question of law. The appeal was dismissed in limine.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.