Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an injunction could be granted under Order XXXIX Rule 1 or Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, to restrain execution of a decree; whether Section 94 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, enlarged that power beyond the Rules; and whether Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, could be invoked to grant such relief.
Analysis: A restraint against execution of a lawfully obtained decree did not fall within Order XXXIX Rule 1, since there was no danger of waste, damage, or alienation of property. It also did not fit Rule 2, because the complained-of act was execution of a decree and could amount to injury only if the decree itself were illegal. Section 94 was held to be controlled by the Rules framed under the Code, so it did not confer a wider independent power. The inherent power under Section 151 could not be used where the Code had already made specific provision and was intended to be exhaustive on the subject.
Conclusion: The Court held that no injunction could be granted on the facts under Order XXXIX, Section 94, or Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Final Conclusion: The petition failed because the Code did not authorise an injunction restraining execution of the decree in the circumstances of the case.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the Code prescribes a specific procedural scheme for a remedy, inherent powers cannot be invoked to override or expand that scheme.