Tribunal Order Challenged & Recalled due to Contradictory Vendor Confirmations

The Miscellaneous Application challenging the Tribunal's order on bogus purchases was allowed. The CIT(A)'s finding that vendors confirmed transactions contradicted the Tribunal's observation, leading to the order's recall for a fresh hearing by a regular bench.

---

---

Issues: Appeal against the order passed by the Tribunal regarding the addition of bogus purchases.

Analysis:
1. The Miscellaneous Application (M.A.) was filed by the assessee challenging the order passed by the Tribunal on 11/01/2017 in relation to ITA No.1045/Mum/2016. The contention raised by the learned AR was that the Tribunal proceeded on the misconception that the assessee did not produce the vendors before the Assessing Officer (AO) and that they did not confirm the transactions entered into with the assessee.

2. The AR argued that the finding of the Tribunal was factually incorrect as it was noted by the Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals (CIT(A)) that the vendors did appear before the AO during the remand proceedings and confirmed the transactions with the assessee. The CIT(A) recorded this finding in his order dated 23rd April 2014, which contradicted the Tribunal's observation. The AR requested the order passed by the Tribunal to be recalled based on this discrepancy.

3. The Departmental Representative (DR) opposed the AR's argument, stating that there was no mistake in the Tribunal's order. However, upon careful examination of the miscellaneous petition, the Tribunal's order, and the orders of the lower authorities, it was found that the Tribunal confirmed the addition of 12.5% for bogus purchases due to the failure of the assessee to produce the alleged bogus parties for examination.

4. Contrary to the Tribunal's observation, the CIT(A) explicitly mentioned in his order that the vendors did appear before the AO during the remand proceedings and confirmed the transactions with the assessee. This finding by the CIT(A) was considered a mistake apparent from the record, leading to the decision to recall the Tribunal's order and direct a fresh hearing by a regular bench.

5. Consequently, the Miscellaneous Application filed by the assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced in open court on 27/10/2017.

This detailed analysis highlights the discrepancies between the findings of the Tribunal and the CIT(A) regarding the confirmation of transactions by vendors, leading to the decision to recall the Tribunal's order for a fresh hearing.

---