Inter-assessee adjustments not valid for interest payments under Income Tax Act. Court rules in favor of Revenue.

The High Court held that adjustments of refunds from other firms cannot be considered as payment under Section 140A for charging interest for the assessee. The Court emphasized that the Income Tax Act does not allow inter-assessee adjustments for offsetting tax liabilities. The Court referred to relevant provisions and a Supreme Court decision highlighting the mandatory nature of charging interest under specific sections of the Act. Consequently, the Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that the interest liability of the assessee cannot be waived through such adjustments.

---

---

Issues:
1. Whether refunds of other firms can be adjusted as payment under section 140A in the case of the assessee for charging interestRs.

Analysis:
The case involves a reference made by the Revenue regarding the adjustment of refunds of other firms against the shortfall of tax of the assessee for charging interest under Section 140A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The background of the case reveals that during a search in the premises of three sister concerns, including the assessee-company, it was discovered that the assesses had not paid tax on self-assessment under Section 140A. The assessee requested the Assessing Officer to adjust the refund of the other two firms against the shortfall of tax of the assessee. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) directed that the refunds of other group cases should be treated as payment under Section 140A for charging interest. The Tribunal upheld this decision, emphasizing that it was a matter of three cases of the same group. However, the High Court opined that the CIT(Appeals) and the Tribunal erred in granting the request of the assessee. The Court highlighted that the Income Tax Act does not recognize inter-assessee adjustments for offsetting excess tax paid by one assessee against the shortfall of another. The Act provides detailed provisions for interest on refunds and unpaid tax. The Court referred to a Supreme Court decision emphasizing the mandatory nature of charging interest under specific sections of the Act. The High Court concluded that the adjustment made by the CIT(Appeals) and the Tribunal was impermissible in law, and the interest liability of the assessee could not be waived by adjusting refunds of other assesses. Therefore, the reference was answered in favor of the Revenue, and the case was disposed of accordingly.

---