Tribunal allows part of assessee's appeal on exclusion of foreign currency expenses from turnover

The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee's appeals for the assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09, agreeing with the exclusion of foreign currency expenses from both export turnover and total turnover. However, it upheld the Revenue's classification of the services as technical services provided from India, thereby reducing the benefit of deduction under Section 10A. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed, affirming the principle that exclusions from export turnover must also apply to total turnover.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Reduction of foreign currency expenditure from export turnover for deduction under Section 10A.
2. Classification of the assessee's services as technical services outside India.
3. Exclusion of foreign currency expenses from total turnover.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Reduction of foreign currency expenditure from export turnover for deduction under Section 10A:

The assessee contested the reduction of foreign currency expenditure from export turnover while computing the deduction under Section 10A. The assessee argued that the expenditure should not be reduced as it was incurred for providing final products in the form of design and software to its holding company. However, the Revenue maintained that the assessee was providing technical services outside India, and thus, the expenses incurred in foreign currency should be excluded from the export turnover as per Explanation 2(iv) of Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal upheld the Revenue's view, agreeing that the assessee was providing technical services rather than exporting articles or software.

2. Classification of the assessee's services as technical services outside India:

The Tribunal examined the nature of the services provided by the assessee, which included creating CAD drawings, flow/stress analysis, developing selection software, and designing pumps and valves. The Tribunal concluded that these activities constituted technical services provided from India, as the assessee used its workforce and infrastructure in India, despite using the server of its parent company in Germany. Therefore, the expenses incurred in foreign currency for these services were not eligible for deduction under Section 10A.

3. Exclusion of foreign currency expenses from total turnover:

The Revenue appealed against the decision to exclude foreign currency expenses from both export turnover and total turnover. The Tribunal referred to the precedent set by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in CIT Vs. Gem Plus Jewellery India Ltd., which established that any amount excluded from export turnover must also be excluded from total turnover. The Tribunal found no error in the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)'s directive to exclude the foreign currency expenses from both export turnover and total turnover, thereby dismissing the Revenue's appeal.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee's appeals for the assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09, agreeing with the exclusion of foreign currency expenses from both export turnover and total turnover. However, it upheld the Revenue's classification of the services as technical services provided from India, thereby reducing the benefit of deduction under Section 10A. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed, affirming the principle that exclusions from export turnover must also apply to total turnover.

---