Assessee wins appeal on disallowances, revenue appeals dismissed.

The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee's appeals by deleting disallowances of De-mat charges and new issue expenses. The issue regarding liability payable to M/s Viraj Investments was restored to the Assessing Officer for verification. The revenue's appeals were dismissed, upholding the deletion of additions related to IPO shares transferred to financiers and penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of De-mat charges and new issue expenses.
2. Addition of Rs. 47,53,110/- due to liability payable to M/s Viraj Investments.
3. Deletion of additions made on account of transferring 50% of IPO shares to financiers at issue price instead of listed price.
4. Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Disallowance of De-mat Charges and New Issue Expenses:
The assessee, dealing in shares, had De-mat charges disallowed by the Assessing Officer (A.O.) for the assessment years 2004-05, 2005-06, and 2006-07, amounting to Rs. 1,26,688/-, Rs. 3,06,942/-, and Rs. 6,07,564/- respectively. The A.O. argued that these expenses were incurred for earning illegal income through multiple IPO applications, thus not allowable as business expenditure under Explanation to section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee relied on Supreme Court and Bombay High Court rulings that expenses incurred in illegal activities should be deductible if the income from such activities is taxed. However, the Tribunal found that De-mat charges paid to banks were not illegal and directed the deletion of the disallowance.

Similarly, the A.O. disallowed new issue expenses, but the Tribunal held that these expenses were incurred wholly and exclusively for earning income from IPO applications and directed their deletion.

2. Addition of Rs. 47,53,110/- Due to Liability Payable to M/s Viraj Investments:
In A.Y. 2006-07, the A.O. added Rs. 47,53,110/- to the assessee's income, claiming that M/s Viraj Investments had written off this amount as bad debt. However, M/s Viraj Investments had also sent a letter to the assessee demanding payment and threatening legal action. The Tribunal restored the issue to the A.O. to verify actual payment in subsequent years and allowed the addition only if the amount was not paid. Interest expenditure related to this amount, if claimed, was also to be added.

3. Deletion of Additions Made on Account of Transferring 50% of IPO Shares to Financiers at Issue Price:
The revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s deletion of additions made for transferring 50% of IPO shares to financiers at issue price instead of listed price. The CIT(A) found that the shares were transferred at issue price as per the arrangement between the assessee and financiers, corroborated by financiers' statements and confirmation letters. The Tribunal upheld CIT(A)'s decision, noting that the A.O. failed to provide evidence of undisclosed additional income and relied on notional estimations. The additions of Rs. 6,67,396/-, Rs. 39,23,272/-, and Rs. 1,72,20,502/- for A.Y. 2004-05, 2005-06, and 2006-07 respectively were deleted.

4. Imposition of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961:
The A.O. imposed a penalty for the addition made due to the difference between the issue price and the lowest listed price of securities transferred to financiers. Since the CIT(A) deleted the quantum addition, the Tribunal dismissed the penalty appeal.

The A.O. also levied a penalty concerning the addition of Rs. 47,53,110/- due from M/s Viraj Investments. The CIT(A) deleted the penalty, noting that the assessee had not concealed income and the issue was debatable. The Tribunal upheld this decision, referencing the Supreme Court ruling in Reliance Petroproducts Pvt. Ltd. (322 ITR 158), and dismissed the revenue's appeal.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeals in part, deleting the disallowances of De-mat charges and new issue expenses, and restored the issue of liability payable to M/s Viraj Investments to the A.O. for verification. The revenue's appeals were dismissed, upholding the deletion of additions related to IPO shares transferred to financiers and the deletion of penalties imposed u/s 271(1)(c).

---