Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order was liable to be set aside for breach of natural justice on the ground that, after the show cause notice and personal hearing, the final order was passed by a different officer after a long delay and without affording an effective opportunity of hearing.
Analysis: The assessment was made under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax regime. The notice had been issued and objections received, but the final order was passed after about two years and by a different officer. The Court treated this as a denial of proper opportunity of hearing and followed the earlier order in the petitioner's own case, where similar facts had led to setting aside of the assessment for violation of Section 22(4) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 and the principles of natural justice. The Court also directed that the petitioner's claim under Section 23 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 be considered on remand.
Conclusion: The assessment order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh assessment after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: An assessment order passed without a proper personal hearing, and after inordinate delay with the final order rendered by a different officer than the one who heard the objections, is liable to be set aside for violation of natural justice and remitted for fresh consideration.