Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the disputed steel structures, base frames, crane girders, crane columns, chimney and flue duct were capital goods or accessories eligible for Cenvat credit and for exemption under Notification No. 67/1995-CE.
Analysis: The items were examined item-wise and found to be specially designed and fabricated for installation with specific plant and machinery. Crane girders, crane rails, crane columns and allied members were held to be essential accessories for the EOT crane and incapable of independent functioning. The base frames were found necessary for mounting heavy machinery with rigidity and vibration-free operation, while chimney and flue duct were treated as essential accessories for emission and transfer of gases. The reasoning accepted that such goods fell within the scope of accessories under Rule 2(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and were used in the factory of the manufacturer. The Revenue failed to dislodge these findings, and the cited precedent was distinguished on facts.
Conclusion: The disputed items were eligible as capital goods accessories and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was rejected and the order allowing the assessee's claim was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods specially designed and fabricated for use with specific machinery, which are essential for the functioning of that machinery and are used in the factory, may qualify as accessories within the capital goods definition for Cenvat credit purposes.