Tribunal favors Profit Split Method for Arm's Length Price, directs AO/TPO for reassessment

The Tribunal concluded that the Profit Split Method (PSM) was the most appropriate method for determining the Arm's Length Price, given the interrelated functions of the companies involved. It found the reasoning for the assessee's shift to PSM due to losses unsubstantiated and noted the method's acceptance in previous and subsequent years. The Tribunal set aside the issue for the AO/TPO to decide following specific directions, allowing the appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Transfer Pricing Adjustment.
2. Comparability Analysis and Profit Split Method.
3. Use of Data and Risk Adjustments.
4. Application of Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM).
5. General Grievances Regarding the Assessment.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Transfer Pricing Adjustment:
The core issue in the appeal was the addition of Rs. 145,259,630/- made by the AO on account of transfer pricing adjustment. The assessee contested this addition, arguing that it was not in accordance with the law and thus not sustainable.

2. Comparability Analysis and Profit Split Method:
The assessee argued that the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) erred in rejecting the comparability analysis without demonstrating any inadequacy in the economic analysis conducted by the assessee. The DRP disregarded the profit split percentage embedded in the Transfer Pricing Documentation, alleging that the arrangement was subjective and not based on empirical data. The assessee had adopted the Profit Split Method (PSM) due to a significant change in its functional matrix, with Infogain India assuming critical delivery functions. The DRP, however, rejected this method, favoring the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) instead.

3. Use of Data and Risk Adjustments:
The DRP supported the TPO's use of data obtained under Section 133(6) of the Act, which was not available to the assessee at the time of maintaining Transfer Pricing Documentation. The DRP also rejected the assessee's claim for risk adjustments, stating that the assessee had not shown how these adjustments would improve comparability. The DRP emphasized that mere pointing out of various risks without evidence of their actual impact on comparables was insufficient.

4. Application of Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM):
The DRP and TPO favored the TNMM over the PSM, arguing that the latter was not demonstrated properly by the assessee. The TPO contended that the assessee's shift to PSM was due to incurred losses, a claim the assessee refuted by explaining the gradual transition in its functional matrix. The DRP upheld the use of single-year data for determining the Arm's Length Price, rejecting the assessee's preference for multiple-year data.

5. General Grievances Regarding the Assessment:
The assessee raised several general grievances, including the excessive and unjust nature of the addition/adjustment, the improper consideration of evidence and explanations provided, and the failure to allow appropriate comparability adjustments. The DRP's reliance on selective information and the rejection of the benefit of (+/-)5% as provided in the proviso to Section 92C(2) of the Act were also contested.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal concluded that the Profit Split Method (PSM) was the most appropriate method for determining the Arm's Length Price, given the inextricably linked and interrelated functions of Infogain India and Infogain US. The Tribunal noted that the TPO's conclusion about the assessee's shift to PSM due to losses was unsubstantiated. The Tribunal also highlighted that the same method had been accepted in preceding and succeeding years. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the issue to the file of the AO/TPO to decide following the directions provided, allowing the appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes.

---