Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a Special Economic Zone unit was entitled to refund of service tax paid on services used for authorised operations when the services were approved by the Approval Committee, and whether refund could be denied on the grounds of ing nexus or because some services were wholly consumed within the SEZ and could have been availed under exemption.
Analysis: The refund claims were based on services said to be used in the authorised operations of the SEZ unit under Notification No. 9/2009-ST. The Tribunal noted that the very same issue had already been decided in the assessee's favour in earlier appeals, following the principle that once the Approval Committee certifies services as relating to authorised operations, a contrary view cannot later be taken by departmental officers. It was also reaffirmed that the existence of an exemption for services wholly consumed within the SEZ does not, by itself, defeat a refund claim where tax has already been paid.
Conclusion: The refund was held admissible and the denial on the grounds of lack of nexus and availability of exemption was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The appeals were allowed with consequential relief to the assessee, following the earlier binding Tribunal view on identical facts.
Ratio Decidendi: Where services are certified as relating to authorised operations of an SEZ unit, refund of service tax cannot be denied by taking a contrary view on nexus, and prior payment of tax does not bar refund merely because an exemption was also available.