Appellant's Appeal Revived After Compliance with Deposit Condition

The appeal against the penalty imposed by the Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax was dismissed as the appellant failed to deposit the required 10% penalty. Despite financial difficulties, the appellant agreed to deposit a substantial amount within a specified timeframe for the appeal to be revived and heard on its merits by CESTAT, Kolkata. Upon compliance with the deposit condition, the appeal was allowed, and the interlocutory application was disposed of in accordance with the final order issued by CESTAT, Kolkata.

---

---

Issues:
1) Appeal against penalty imposed by Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax
2) Closure of factory premises of M/s. Amba Re-rolling Mill Pvt Ltd
3) Financial status of the company and penalty amount
4) Deposit of penalty amount for revival of appeal before CESTAT, Kolkata

Analysis:
1) The appeal was filed by one of the Directors in M/s. Amba Re-Rolling Mill Pvt. Ltd. against the penalty imposed by the Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, Jamshedpur. The appellant was directed to deposit 10% of the penalty, but as the amount was not deposited, the appeal was dismissed.

2) The factory premises of M/s. Amba Re-rolling Mill Pvt Ltd had been closed down since 2009. The balance sheet of the company showed a loss of &8377;4,20,789 during the assessment year 2011-12. Despite the company having a current asset of approximately &8377;3.00 Crores as of 31st March, 2011, a 10% penalty was ordered to be deposited by the appellant.

3) The penalty amount of 10% imposed on the appellant was deemed reasonable. The counsel for the appellant agreed to deposit &8377;10.00 lakhs within four weeks on the condition that the appeal before CESTAT, Kolkata would be revived and decided on its merits.

4) The appellant was allowed to deposit the penalty amount of &8377;10.00 Lakhs before CESTAT, Kolkata within four weeks. If the deposit was made within the stipulated period, the appeal would be revived and heard on its merits by CESTAT, Kolkata. The appeal was allowed and disposed of accordingly, with the interlocutory application also being disposed of in light of the final order passed in the main appeal.

---