Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the loss arising from purchase and sale of shares was to be treated as speculation loss under the Explanation to Section 73 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, or as business loss eligible for set-off against business income in the case of a non-banking financial company.
Analysis: The determining factor was the principal business of the assessee. The record showed that the assessee was registered with the Reserve Bank of India as a non-banking financial company, and Chapter III-B of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 had overriding significance in that context. On that basis, the assessee was to be regarded as a company whose principal business was granting loans and advances. The deeming provision in the Explanation to Section 73 had to be construed strictly and, on the facts found, could not be invoked to characterise the share-trading loss as speculation loss. The authorities relied upon by the Revenue were held to be factually distinguishable.
Conclusion: The Explanation to Section 73 was not applicable, and the share-trading loss was rightly allowed to be set off against business income. The Revenue's ground failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a company is registered and functioning as an NBFC whose principal business is granting loans and advances, the Explanation to Section 73 does not apply to treat its share-trading loss as speculation loss; the deeming fiction must be strictly construed.