ITAT directs AO on foreign income treatment & overturns 44AD presumption

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to reevaluate the treatment of foreign income by using the average exchange rate and considering fresh evidence for exchange rates at the time of income receipt. The ITAT also ruled that the presumptive profit under section 44AD does not apply when turnover exceeds Rs. 40 lakhs and instructed the AO to assess foreign income in accordance with the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) between India and Oman. The appeal of the revenue was allowed for statistical purposes, and the cross objections of the assessee were partly allowed.

---

---

Issues:
1. Treatment of foreign income and foreign tax credit in assessment.
2. Applicability of presumptive profit under section 44AD when turnover exceeds a certain limit.
3. Consideration of Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) for assessment of foreign income.

Issue 1: Treatment of Foreign Income and Foreign Tax Credit:
The appeal involved a dispute regarding the treatment of foreign income and foreign tax credit in assessment. The Assessing Officer (AO) converted the foreign income to Indian Rupees (INR) using the exchange rate at the end of the previous year. The Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals (CITA) directed the adoption of the average exchange rate for taxing foreign income and using the exchange rate on the date of tax payment for foreign tax credit. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the provisions of Rule 26 and Rule 115 of Income Tax Rules provide the mechanism for converting foreign currency into Indian currency. The ITAT set aside the issue to the AO to determine foreign income in accordance with the rules, allowing consideration of fresh evidence for exchange rates at the time of income receipt. The appeal of the revenue was allowed for statistical purposes.

Issue 2: Applicability of Presumptive Profit under Section 44AD:
The cross objection by the assessee challenged the confirmation of the AO's order for determining presumptive profit under section 44AD despite the turnover exceeding Rs. 40 lakhs. Section 44AD specifies that the provision does not apply if the gross receipts exceed Rs. 40 lakhs. The ITAT held that the application of the presumptive rate of taxation under section 44AD when the turnover exceeds the threshold was not justified. Therefore, the cross objection of the assessee on this issue was allowed.

Issue 3: Consideration of Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA):
The cross objection raised by the assessee highlighted the failure of the CITA to consider the impact of the DTAA between India and Oman on the assessment of foreign income. The ITAT directed the AO to assess foreign income in accordance with the relevant article of the DTAA and the provisions of section 90 of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the cross objection of the assessee on this issue was allowed for statistical purposes.

In conclusion, the ITAT allowed the appeal of the revenue for statistical purposes, partly allowed the cross objection of the assessee, and directed the AO to reevaluate the treatment of foreign income, applicability of presumptive profit under section 44AD, and consideration of the DTAA for assessment purposes.

---