Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the use of naptha purchased under Form No. 26/40 was confined to the assessee's own manufacturing activity so as to negate any breach of the incentive conditions and, consequently, the levy of purchase tax, interest and penalty under the Gujarat Sales Tax Act.
Analysis: The entire naptha purchased under Form No. 26/40 was used in the gas turbine for generating electricity for the assessee's own unit. The steam used in the second turbine was only a waste by-product arising from that process, and the small quantity of electricity wheeled to the sister concern was generated from that steam. On those facts, no part of the naptha was diverted for any purpose other than the assessee's own manufacture. The Tribunal's findings were factual and were not shown to be perverse or vitiated by legal error.
Conclusion: There was no breach of Form No. 26/40, and the levy of purchase tax, interest and penalty was not justified. No substantial question of law arose for interference; the appeals were rightly dismissed.