Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether question No. 1 regarding the Tribunal's cancellation of concealment penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 arose from the Tribunal's order and required reference to the High Court.
Analysis: The Tribunal had reversed the penalty order by relying on earlier decisions accepting the assessee's explanation. The Court noted that the earlier view based on section 28(1)(c) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 had since been explained as no longer governing the construction of section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 after the later Full Bench decision. On that basis, the question concerning the legality of cancelling the penalties was a referable question of law.
Conclusion: Question No. 1 was held to arise from the Tribunal's order and was directed to be referred for the Court's opinion.