Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to interest on delayed release of rebate/refund amount that was initially sanctioned, appropriated towards dues, and later released pursuant to the High Court's direction.
Analysis: The rebate amount had been sanctioned and then adjusted against alleged dues during a period when the stay on the underlying demand was not in force. The High Court subsequently set aside the recovery and directed release of the amount, which was complied with on 10.12.2012. Since the sanctioned rebate was not actually paid when due and was released only after delay, the appellant was held entitled to interest on the delayed payment. The Tribunal also followed its own earlier decisions in the appellant's case, which had applied the principle governing payment of interest on delayed refund.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to interest on the delayed rebate amount, and the denial of interest was unsustainable.