Natural justice in Cenvat credit disputes requires cross-examination and proper review of documentary records before adjudication.

Denial of cross-examination and inadequate scrutiny of the appellant's documentary records vitiated the adjudication on Cenvat credit. The Tribunal found that the lower authorities had relied on a witness statement that conflicted with the appellant's documents, yet the request to cross-examine that witness was rejected. This failure to test the evidence and to properly consider records on receipt and use of goods amounted to breach of natural justice. The matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for cross-examination, consideration of the records, and fresh adjudication.

---

---

Issues: Whether the denial of cross-examination and failure to consider the appellant's documentary records vitiated the adjudication and justified remand.

Analysis: The dispute on merits arose from denial of Cenvat credit, but the Tribunal found that the lower authorities had not adequately examined the appellant's records regarding receipt and use of goods. The appellant's request to cross-examine the witness whose statement was relied upon was not allowed, even though that statement conflicted with the documentary material produced by the appellant. In these circumstances, the adjudication suffered from violation of the principles of natural justice.

Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for cross-examination, consideration of the appellant's records, and fresh adjudication.

---