Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether tax was deductible under section 194LA on compensation paid for acquisition of non-agricultural land, and whether payments made under agreements fixing compensation under the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act amounted to compulsory acquisition.
Analysis: Section 194LA applies only to sums paid on account of compulsory acquisition of immovable property other than agricultural land. The compensation papers showed that, at least in the agreement relied upon, the amount was fixed by agreement under section 29(2) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act. Where compensation is settled by mutual agreement, the acquisition does not answer the description of compulsory acquisition. At the same time, the record did not establish that all disputed payments were made under identical agreements, so the factual nature of each acquisition required verification.
Conclusion: Section 194LA was not shown to apply as a matter of law to acquisitions settled by agreement, and the matter was remitted to verify whether the disputed payments were in fact made pursuant to such agreements.
Ratio Decidendi: Tax deduction under section 194LA arises only where compensation is paid on account of compulsory acquisition, and an acquisition concluded by agreement on compensation fixed under the governing statute is outside that section unless the facts show otherwise.