Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on service tax paid on outward transportation of goods from the factory to the buyer's premises, where the assessee claimed compliance with the Board circular and the evidentiary record required verification.
Analysis: The claim for credit was founded on the assertion that the goods were supplied on a delivery basis to the buyer's premises and that the outward freight fell within the business activity covered by the applicable circular. The appellate authority had not finally accepted the claim on an unverified record, but had directed the lower authority to examine the relevant documents for the relevant period. In these circumstances, the order was treated as one requiring factual verification rather than as an erroneous denial on principle.
Conclusion: The credit claim was not finally negatived in the revenue appeal, and no interference was called for with the direction for verification.
Final Conclusion: The revenue challenge failed, and the assessee's position was left undisturbed subject to verification of the supporting evidence.