Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether CENVAT credit was admissible on service tax paid on goods transport service for inward transport of inputs and materials to the factory where the transport was arranged by the consignor on behalf of the appellant.
Analysis: The service was treated as inward transportation of inputs for the manufacture of excisable goods, which falls within the scope of input service as clarified by Circular No. 97/8/2007 dated 23.08.2007. The fact that the consignor facilitated the transport and paid the service tax on the appellant's behalf did not alter the position that the appellant was the recipient of the transport service for its factory-bound inputs.
Conclusion: CENVAT credit was admissible to the appellant on the transportation charges, and the denial of credit was unsustainable.