Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending the appeal.
Analysis: The application was considered in the context of the duty and penalty imposed under the Chewing Tobacco and Unmanufactured Tobacco Packing Machines Rules and the penalty provision under the Central Excise law. The Tribunal noted that the appellant had already made part payment during adjudication and that the Commissioner had recorded reasons while directing pre-deposit. Taking a prima facie view and considering the amounts already deposited, the Tribunal found it appropriate to require only a further limited deposit before granting relief against the remaining dues.
Conclusion: Complete waiver was declined. The appellant was directed to deposit a further sum of Rs. 2.10 lakhs within eight weeks, and upon such deposit, waiver of the balance pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted during pendency of the appeal.