Appellate enhancement in income assessment must stay within the remand and cannot add a new source of income.

Enhancement in income assessment is confined to the subject-matter already examined at the assessment stage and to the scope of any remand. Where the accounts of Ganesh Trading Company and Mahavir Trading Company had already been considered by the Income-tax Officer and were within the remand, the enhancement was valid and sustained. By contrast, Shivshankar and Company was outside the remand and could not be added as a new source of income on material found later; that enhancement was not sustainable. The governing principle is that appellate enhancement cannot travel beyond the record or enlarge the remand beyond the matters originally under consideration.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the Appellate Assistant Commissioner could sustain enhancement in respect of the accounts of Ganesh Trading Company and Mahavir Trading Company without travelling beyond the record or introducing a new source of income. (ii) Whether the enhancement based on the account of Shivshankar and Company could be sustained when that account was not specifically covered by the remand.

Issue (i): Whether the Appellate Assistant Commissioner could sustain enhancement in respect of the accounts of Ganesh Trading Company and Mahavir Trading Company without travelling beyond the record or introducing a new source of income.

Analysis: The accounts of these two concerns in the assessee's books had been expressly considered by the Income-tax Officer for their taxability. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner remanded the matter for further inquiry and kept the appeal alive pending the report. The enhancement was based on the very subject-matter already processed at the assessment stage and the remand preserved the assessee's right to contest the matter on the fuller material.

Conclusion: The enhancement relating to Ganesh Trading Company and Mahavir Trading Company was valid and stood sustained.

Issue (ii): Whether the enhancement based on the account of Shivshankar and Company could be sustained when that account was not specifically covered by the remand.

Analysis: The remand was confined to the specified accounts of Ganesh Trading Company and Mahavir Trading Company. Shivshankar and Company was not part of the subject remanded for inquiry, and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner could not enlarge the scope of enhancement to include that account on the basis of material discovered during the remand proceedings.

Conclusion: The enhancement relating to Shivshankar and Company was not sustainable.

Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on the challenge to the enhancement based on Shivshankar and Company, while the enhancement relating to Ganesh Trading Company and Mahavir Trading Company was upheld.

Ratio Decidendi: The power of enhancement is confined to the subject-matter of assessment already considered by the Income-tax Officer, and where a new source or a matter beyond the remand is sought to be added, it cannot be sustained without proper consideration at the assessment stage.

---