Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment and penalty additions sustained by the first appellate authority required interference and restoration for fresh adjudication in view of lack of proper consideration and opportunity.
Analysis: The matter arose from an assessment completed ex parte under section 144 and penalties sustained under sections 271(1)(b) and 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The order noted that the authorities below had not passed fully speaking orders and that the assessee's clarifications were not properly examined. In the interests of substantial justice, and to ensure a fair opportunity of hearing, the matter was considered fit to be sent back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration.
Conclusion: The assessment and penalty matters were restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication after granting the assessee due opportunity of hearing.