Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition made under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on account of an unsecured loan was sustainable where the assessee produced banking evidence, confirmation, and material showing the lender's identity, creditworthiness, and the genuineness of the transaction.
Analysis: The assessee produced a bank certificate, bank statement, affidavit of the lender, and the lender's return of income to show that the loan was advanced through banking channels from the lender's NRE account. The record established the lender's identity and demonstrated that the credited amount came from abroad into the NRE account. The Court held that, for purposes of section 68, the assessee is required to prove the identity of the creditor, the creditor's capacity to advance the money, and the genuineness of the transaction. It further held that the assessee is not required to prove the source of the source. On the facts, the Revenue's objection that the assessee had not produced the lender's foreign bank account did not dislodge the documentary evidence already produced.
Conclusion: The addition under section 68 was not justified and was deleted; the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Once the assessee proves the creditor's identity, creditworthiness vis-a -vis the transaction, and genuineness of the banking transaction, an addition under section 68 cannot be sustained merely because the assessee has not proved the source of the creditor's source.