Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner-bank was entitled to refund of the amount adjusted against tax demand in view of the earlier appellate order, and whether refund could be denied while that order remained unstayed and un-set aside.
Analysis: The earlier appellate decision had held that the provision invoked against the bank was not applicable on the relevant deposit, and the Court treated that legal position as continuing for subsequent assessment years unless the provision was amended or substituted. In view of the submission that the demand had already been deleted in appeal, the Court held that the refund claim required reconsideration by the income-tax authorities. It further directed that if the demand had in fact been deleted, the amount adjusted by the department had to be refunded with statutory interest. The Court also clarified that refund could not be denied so long as the appellate order continued to operate and had neither been stayed nor set aside by a higher forum.
Conclusion: The refund issue was answered in favour of the petitioner-bank, with a direction for a decision on the refund applications and refund with interest if the demand had been deleted.
Final Conclusion: The proceeding was disposed of by directing reconsideration of the refund claim and by recognising the bank's entitlement to refund with interest if the underlying demand no longer survived.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an appellate order deleting the demand remains operative and has not been stayed or set aside, the revenue cannot refuse refund, and statutory refund interest follows where the tax demand has been deleted.