Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Commissioner had the authority to issue the circular insisting on digitally signed online Form 15 for transportation of goods and whether the petitioners were entitled to relief on the ground of practical difficulty and discriminatory exemption.
Analysis: The statutory scheme permitted electronic filing and payment, and specifically empowered the Commissioner to make suitable modifications in prescribed forms and in the manner of submission and authentication for implementation of electronic filing. In that setting, the impugned circular could not be invalidated on the ground of want of power or jurisdiction. However, the petitioners had raised a separate grievance regarding practical hardship, including lack of internet access at the relevant locations and transport by railway wagons. The Court found that these representations required administrative consideration by the Commissioner after hearing the affected parties in a representative capacity.
Conclusion: The challenge to the Commissioner's power to issue the circular was rejected, and the petitioners were granted a direction for consideration of their representations in accordance with law.