Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in relation to the demand of CENVAT credit, interest and penalty, on a prima facie view that credit taken on service tax paid on lease rent was admissible.
Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the leased factory had been taken over by the secured creditor under the SARFAESI regime, and whether the service tax paid on lease rent, though deposited in the name of the original borrower, could be treated as validly paid for purposes of credit. The Tribunal noted that the secured creditor was exercising powers over the asset under the SARFAESI Act and that ownership rights of the borrower were not extinguished. It further observed that tax payment was not disputed and that the validity of the demand, including invocation of the extended period, required examination at final hearing. On this view, the issue was considered debatable and credit appeared prima facie allowable.
Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery of tax, interest and penalty was stayed till disposal of the appeal.