Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether income disclosed to the Department by way of a belated return and related communication prior to search could still be treated as "undisclosed income" under Chapter XIV-B.
Analysis: The income in question had been communicated to the Department nearly three years before the search, first through a voluntary disclosure scheme and then through a subsequent return and correspondence. The defining feature of "undisclosed income" under Section 158B(b) is that it must be income not disclosed for the purposes of the Act. On the facts, the Department itself already had the relevant information before the search, and the search did not uncover any previously suppressed material. The Court distinguished the precedent relied upon by the Revenue, as that case dealt with advance tax and did not involve prior disclosure of the same income to the Department. Once the assessee had already placed the income before the Department, it could not be re-characterised as undisclosed income merely because the return was belated or irregular.
Conclusion: The income was not undisclosed income within the meaning of Section 158B(b), and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Income already disclosed to the Department before search cannot be treated as undisclosed income under Chapter XIV-B merely because the return in which it was shown was belated or otherwise not a valid return under Section 139.