Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reference question concerning entitlement to relief under section 80K of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be answered when the Tribunal had dismissed the Revenue's appeals without examining their merits.
Analysis: The Tribunal had not adjudicated the Revenue's appeals on merits and had dismissed them only because a similar relief had been granted to the company. In a reference arising from such an order, the High Court declined to pronounce on the referred question, observing that appeals filed in time under the Act must be decided on merits by the Tribunal and that, if necessary, hearing could have been deferred until related references were decided.
Conclusion: The reference question was not answered.
Final Conclusion: No substantive determination was made on the assessee's entitlement to relief; the Court left the referred question unanswered and left the parties to bear their own costs.
Ratio Decidendi: A reference will not be answered where the appellate order under challenge has not been decided on merits, because the Tribunal must first adjudicate the appeals on their substance.