Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2015 (8) TMI 703 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Transfer Pricing Appeal: Assessee's Victory with Exclusions, Working Capital Adjustments, and Non-TP Claims The Tribunal partially allowed the Assessee's appeal in a Transfer Pricing case involving software development services and ITES segments. The Tribunal ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Transfer Pricing Appeal: Assessee's Victory with Exclusions, Working Capital Adjustments, and Non-TP Claims

                          The Tribunal partially allowed the Assessee's appeal in a Transfer Pricing case involving software development services and ITES segments. The Tribunal directed the exclusion of specific comparables, accepted additional evidence for working capital adjustments, and allowed non-TP related claims for club expenses and employee provident fund liability. The Assessee's Transfer Pricing adjustments were upheld in part, with adjustments made to the ALP in both segments.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustments in the software development services segment.
                          2. Transfer Pricing adjustments in the ITES segment.
                          3. Non-TP related issues including disallowance of club expenses and employee provident fund liability.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          Transfer Pricing Adjustments in Software Development Services Segment:
                          The Assessee, engaged in providing IT enabled services and software development, reported various international transactions with associated enterprises (AEs). The TPO did not agree with the Assessee's Transfer Pricing Analysis and chose 33 comparable companies. The Assessee's request for working capital adjustment was denied by the TPO due to lack of supporting documents. The TPO determined the ALP of the international transaction on rendering software development services, resulting in an adjustment of Rs. 1,81,05,618, which was confirmed by the CIT(Appeals).

                          The Assessee argued for the exclusion of Infosys Technologies Ltd. and Satyam Computer Services Ltd. from the list of comparables, citing decisions from ITAT Delhi Bench and Hon'ble Delhi High Court. The Tribunal directed the exclusion of these companies from the final list of comparables.

                          Regarding Visualsoft Technologies Ltd., the Assessee contended that the TPO incorrectly computed the OP/TC margin. The Tribunal directed the TPO/AO to verify the Assessee's claim and consider the segmental margins if found correct.

                          The Tribunal also accepted the Assessee's additional evidence for working capital adjustment and remanded the issue to the TPO/AO for fresh consideration.

                          Transfer Pricing Adjustments in ITES Segment:
                          In the ITES segment, the Assessee reported an OP/TC margin of 12.62%. The TPO chose 6 comparable companies and determined the ALP, resulting in an adjustment of Rs. 1,21,45,823, which was confirmed by the DRP. The Assessee sought the exclusion of Allsec Technologies Ltd. due to business restructuring and super-normal profits. The Tribunal, referencing ITAT Hyderabad Bench's decision, directed the exclusion of Allsec Technologies Ltd. from the list of comparables.

                          The Tribunal also directed the TPO/AO to allow working capital adjustment in the ITES segment after verifying the details filed by the Assessee.

                          Non-TP Related Issues:
                          1. Club Expenses: The Assessee's claim for club expenses of Rs. 89,746 was disallowed by the Revenue authorities as personal in nature. The Tribunal, referencing the Hon'ble Supreme Court decision in CIT v. United Glass Mfg. Co. Ltd., allowed the claim as business expenses under Section 37 of the Act.

                          2. Employee Provident Fund Liability: The Assessee's contribution to the provident fund amounting to Rs. 34,965 was disallowed under Section 36(1)(va). The Tribunal, referencing the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court decision in CIT v. Sabari Enterprises & Ors., allowed the deduction as the contribution was paid before the due date for filing the return of income.

                          Conclusion:
                          The appeal of the Assessee was partly allowed, with directions for exclusion of certain comparables, acceptance of additional evidence for working capital adjustments, and allowance of non-TP related claims.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found