Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the filing of a revised return before completion of assessment wipes out the original false return so as to bar criminal prosecution under the Income-tax Act and the Indian Penal Code.
Analysis: A revised return under section 139(5) of the Income-tax Act does not obliterate the original return or erase the earlier concealment if the original return contained false particulars. The subsequent revised return may be relevant to the overall facts, but it does not confer immunity from penalty or prosecution where the initial return and accompanying statement of accounts were allegedly false and the materials disclose a prima facie wilful attempt to evade tax and furnish false verification. The question whether the petitioner acted through mistake or knowingly filed a false return was held to be a matter for trial and not for quashing proceedings.
Conclusion: The prosecution was held maintainable and the petition for quashing failed.
Final Conclusion: The Court declined to interfere with the criminal proceedings, holding that a revised return does not by itself nullify the legal effect of an original false return where the allegations disclose prima facie offences.
Ratio Decidendi: A revised return filed before assessment does not, by itself, wipe out the earlier false return or bar criminal prosecution where the original return and related statements disclose a prima facie offence.